Come see us at www.familyfirst.org
Finally! Parental Consent Bill Gets Out of Committee
May 12, 2011By Dave Bydalek
After 11 years of working at the Nebraska Unicameral, I have observed all kinds of tactics designed to stall or kill legislation. It would take quite a bit to surprise me. That being said, I was taken aback by the obstacles and schemes used to keep LB 690 from advancing from the Judiciary Committee for debate by the entire Unicameral. LB 690 would change Nebraska’s law from parental notice to parental consent for abortion.
Objection after objection was raised to various provisions of the bill – to be specific, at least ten purported problems. None of these issues were substantive, but this scheme was effective in stalling the bill until day 78 of the 90 day session. Planned Parenthood was a consistent presence in the lobby, and it is clear many of the arguments against the bill were coming directly from them. While LB 690 will not break new legal ground, it is evident that parental consent laws better protect the health and welfare of minors by allowing parents to be directly involved in the medical decisions of their minor daughters and to help them make their best personal choices, including carrying the child to term and not having abortions.
We are so thankful for our ministry partners, who make our work possible. Without the ability to be at the Capitol to counter Planned Parenthood’s presence, we believe LB 690 would have effectively been pushed back another year. Speaker Mike Flood also deserves a heartfelt thanks. His direct intervention on behalf of the bill was important in moving the bill forward. Finally, Sen. Lydia Brasch, who introduced and prioritized the bill, never wavered in getting LB 690 considered this session.
Parental Consent Stalled in Committee
May 2, 2011The legislative session is down to it’s final 28 days, and LB 690 is still stalled in committee.
LB 690, Sen. Lydia Brasch’s priority bill, would establish that a pregnant minor must get parental consent prior before she can make the life-altering decision to have an abortion.
During the past several months, Family First and other supporters of LB 690 have addressed numerous questions from members of the Judiciary Committee, ranging from constitutional issues to privacy concerns.
Each time Family First dealt with a concern, another supposed issue was raised. And last week, Attorney General Bruning released an Attorney general’s opinion concluding that LB 690 is on solid constitutional ground.
Frankly, certain members of the Judiciary Committee are engaging in stall tactics.
Gov. Kay Orr
For more on this important piece of legislation, click here to read former Nebraska Governor and Family First Board Member Kay Orr’s excellent op-ed piece in the Omaha World Herald.
Dave on KLIN 1400
February 25, 2011Executive Director Dave Bydalek testified Wednesday at the Unicameral for LB 232, which would clarify in the law that a pregnant woman could use deadly force to protect her unborn child.
Who testified against LB 232? The ACLU and Planned Parenthood of course.
Click here to listen to the podcast of Dave’s interview on Drive Time Lincoln (KLIN) with Coby Mach to hear more about this bill. During this interview Dave also discusses President Obama’s announcement to no longer defend DOMA.
City on a Hill Youth Leadership Conference
February 25, 2011City on a Hill Youth Leadership Conference is coming June 12-17 in Lincoln.
Obama Disregards DOMA
February 25, 2011Obama Disregards DOMA
President Obama’s announcement that he and Attorney General Holder will no longer defend the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is a repudiation of their oath of office to support the Constitution of the United States. Both offices are constitutionally bound to uphold and defend the federal laws duly established by Congress.
Both the United States House of Representatives and the Senate have legal authority to intervene in pending lawsuits to defend the federal DOMA statute.
DOMA was passed by Congress with an overwhelming majority and bi-partisan support before being signed into law by President Clinton in 1996. DOMA has served to protect the natural definition of marriage ever since. It is egregious for the nation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Law Enforcement Officer to pick and choose what parts of the constitution or federal laws they will support.
